Story
September 2, 2026

Dolly Parton’s Walk of Fame Star Is Repaired After Reported Scratches

Reports from across the political spectrum say Dolly Parton’s Hollywood Walk of Fame star was damaged while already scheduled for restoration. Officials said repair crews were working to return the landmark for visitors by Friday.

Accounts from both right- and left-leaning outlets describe the same basic episode: reported scratches on Dolly Parton’s Hollywood Walk of Fame star upset fans, while the landmark’s caretakers said restoration had already been planned to address cracking.

The apparent damage came at a particularly emotional moment, as visitors had been leaving flowers at Parton’s star following reports of her death. The dispute is less over what happened than over emphasis: coverage agrees the star was reportedly scratched, but also stresses that crews were already due to repair it.

Right-leaning reports said Ana Martinez, a spokesperson for the Hollywood Chamber of Commerce, was alerted after a fan reported damage to the star. They said the surface had existing cracks and that flowers left in tribute were cleared so the Hollywood Historic Trust could begin the scheduled work. Martinez said the refurbishment would be completed in time for fans to visit by Friday.

Those reports also pointed to video said to show workers restoring the marker after Parton’s name was allegedly scratched. Fans reacted with distress, with one writing, “This hurts my heart so much.” Another commenter, however, highlighted the repair explanation, saying the star “was broken from normal wear and tear” and needed replacement.

Left-leaning coverage similarly framed the incident as vandalism reported while planned restoration was underway. It said the star, awarded to Parton in 1984, had become a place of remembrance, and quoted another fan who saw the incident as a reminder that “no matter who you are or what you do - someone will hate you.”

The common thread is that the reported scratches heightened fans’ sense of loss, while officials’ account placed the work within a broader maintenance project rather than a response solely to the newly reported damage.