Story
Invalid Date
Israel Vote Pits Netanyahu’s Security Record Against a Demand for Change
The election presents competing prescriptions for Israel’s future: Netanyahu’s allies stress military strength and his international partnerships, while Eisenkot’s opposition argues that security failures and strained public trust require a change in leadership.
Israelis voting in a closely fought election face a choice framed both as a judgment on Benjamin Netanyahu’s security record and as a test of whether his opponents can turn dissatisfaction into a governing coalition. Polls point to a tight result, but neither major bloc is expected to secure the 61 seats required for a Knesset majority.
Netanyahu has campaigned on military operations against Hamas, Hezbollah and Iran, while presenting his relationship with US President Donald Trump as an asset. Trump urged voters to back the prime minister, calling him an “outstanding warrior prime minister” and saying the pair could “finish the job” in Iran.1 Netanyahu’s coalition depends on right-wing and ultra-Orthodox partners, making post-election bargaining central even if Likud finishes first.2
Eisenkot, the former military chief leading the newer Yashar party, offers a contrasting case: stronger public institutions, an inquiry into the 7 October attacks and broader national service. His wider opposition grouping spans ideological lines, from security-focused figures including Naftali Bennett and Avigdor Lieberman to the left-leaning former general Yair Golan; their shared objective is replacing Netanyahu.3
Both camps put security at the centre of the campaign, but they draw opposite conclusions from it. Netanyahu points to regional military gains and argues he is best placed to confront Iran. His critics hold him accountable for the failures preceding the Hamas-led 7 October attack and question his resistance to an independent inquiry.3 Eisenkot has himself maintained a hard security posture, including a pledge to end Hamas rule, underscoring how limited the divide can be on Gaza even as the candidates differ over accountability and democratic safeguards.3
The immediate outcome may therefore be less decisive than the negotiations that follow. With Arab parties potentially influential but largely excluded by leading Jewish parties, and with internal vetoes across both blocs, Israel could face weeks—or longer—of coalition talks.3